Trump angrily attacks Netanyahu over military escalation in Lebanon
In a rapidly escalating political development reflecting deep behind-the-scenes disagreements, American media reports revealed that US President Trump strongly criticized Netanyahu over the recent military escalation in Lebanon. According to Axios, citing US officials and informed sources, a heated phone call took place between the two leaders, during which Trump described Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as "crazy" and accused him of ingratitude, in what was one of the worst exchanges between the two leaders since Trump's return to the White House.
Details of the stormy call and warnings of Israel's isolation
Sources indicated that the US president strongly opposed military strikes on the Lebanese capital, Beirut, warning that continued such actions could further isolate Israel internationally. Trump expressed grave concern over the high number of civilian casualties in Lebanon, deeming Israel's response to Hezbollah attacks disproportionate and beyond acceptable limits. He also voiced genuine apprehension that this reckless escalation could derail ongoing diplomatic efforts and the delicate nuclear negotiations with Iran.
Why is Trump attacking Netanyahu now? Historical dimensions and political background
To understand the dimensions of this tension, one must return to the historical context of the relationship between the two men. Despite the unwavering support Trump provided to Israel during his first term—which included moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights—the relationship subsequently experienced clear cracks. Observers note that Trump consistently demands absolute loyalty, and that any unilateral Israeli move that could harm US strategic interests in the Middle East is met with firm rejection from him. This current divergence reflects the new US administration's desire to forge a different regional balance of power that ensures stability without being drawn into a full-blown regional war.
Regional and international repercussions of the escalation in Lebanon
This public dispute carries significant implications at the local, regional, and international levels. Domestically, in Israel, Netanyahu faces increasing pressure to balance his far-right allies with maintaining the vital strategic alliance with Washington. Regionally, the international community fears that targeting Beirut could ignite other conflicts and draw major regional players, such as Iran, into direct confrontation. Internationally, these developments strengthen diplomatic pressure for a ceasefire and the protection of civilians, and underscore the United States' commitment to establishing clear red lines to prevent further deterioration of the security situation in the Middle East.
Mutual pledges and efforts to de-escalate tensions via the “Truth Social” platform
In an attempt to contain the situation and assert his diplomatic influence, President Trump announced via his Truth Social account that the Israeli Prime Minister had pledged to him during a phone call he described as "very productive" that no military forces would be sent to Beirut, confirming that the forces already en route had withdrawn. Trump also revealed that positive contacts had been made with Hezbollah through intermediaries, resulting in the Iranian-backed group's agreement to a ceasefire. He emphasized the mutual de-escalation formula, stating, "Israel will not attack them, and they will not attack Israel," thus opening the door to a new phase of cautious calm in the region.
