Endowments used to evade debt: Endowments clarify protection and creditors' rights

The General Authority for Endowments in Saudi Arabia affirmed that establishing an endowment (waqf) to evade debts has no legal or religious protection, noting that this practice constitutes an unacceptable deception aimed at harming the rights of others. The Authority clarified that creditors have the full right to seek the annulment of such an endowment through the competent courts to ensure the recovery of their financial rights and protect them from any illegal practices that might attempt to conceal assets under the guise of charitable or endowment work.
Legal and regulatory controls to prevent the exploitation of endowments to evade debts
Historically, Islamic endowments (waqf) have been a fundamental pillar of sustainable development and social solidarity, established to achieve public benefit and draw closer to God by dedicating the principal and its proceeds to charitable purposes. However, Islamic law and the regulations in force in the Kingdom consistently emphasize that "preventing harm takes precedence over pursuing benefits," and that the rights of individuals are based on strict accountability and the right to demand repayment. Therefore, using endowments to evade debts is entirely contrary to the noble objectives of Islamic law, transforming them from acts of charity and benevolence into a means of harming creditors. This is categorically rejected by Islamic law, and the regulations prohibit their exploitation as a shield to protect assets from legal enforcement.
When are creditors entitled to legally invalidate an endowment?
The General Authority for Endowments clarified that the annulment of an endowment is not automatic but requires a court ruling from the competent court. This occurs when creditors can prove that the debtor endowed their funds or assets at a time when their outstanding debts exceeded their remaining financial solvency and actual assets. In such cases, the court carefully examines the circumstances surrounding the establishment of the endowment and verifies whether there was any premeditated intent to harm creditors or circumvent the financial regulations and instructions in force in the Kingdom.
The economic and social impact of protecting financial rights
This decisive clarification from the General Authority for Endowments has significant implications at both the local and regional levels. Locally, this measure contributes to strengthening confidence in the Kingdom's investment and business environment, assuring investors and creditors that their rights are protected by law and cannot be circumvented through endowment channels. It also enhances the efficiency of the bankruptcy and financial transactions system, thereby reducing the number of outstanding cases and expediting the recovery of rights. Regionally and internationally, this approach reinforces the Kingdom's position as a country that applies best regulatory and judicial practices, balancing the encouragement of charitable and endowment activities with the preservation of financial stability and the protection of private property.
Bankruptcy procedures and handling insolvency claims
The authority noted that the courts pay close attention to reviewing these cases before registering insolvency claims or after initiating bankruptcy proceedings for debtors. This scrutiny is conducted to ensure that loopholes in the system are not exploited, emphasizing that protecting creditors' financial rights is a fundamental and non-negotiable principle when assessing the validity of financial transactions undertaken by debtors before their bankruptcy or insolvency is declared.



