Freedom of expression or media chaos? The limits of criticism in Saudi Arabia
In the age of the rapidly accelerating digital revolution, where the boundaries between sender and receiver have blurred and social media platforms have become open arenas for the exchange of information, a fundamental question arises regarding the fine line separating freedom of expression as an inherent right from the media chaos that threatens the stability of societies. This debate is not a recent phenomenon; rather, it is the product of profound technological and societal transformations that have reshaped the concepts of media and responsibility.
General context: From traditional media to open space
Historically, traditional media outlets were subject to strict editorial controls that ensured a minimum level of credibility and professionalism. With the emergence of new media, power shifted to the public, creating a fertile environment for diverse opinions, but also opening the door to irresponsible practices. In this context, the statements of Saudi Minister of Information, Salman Al-Dossari, outline the current phase, emphasizing that the state will not tolerate the exploitation of freedom to incite chaos or inflame public opinion, while categorically affirming that freedom of expression is guaranteed as long as it remains within the legal framework that protects everyone's rights.
Freedom of expression: a guaranteed right and necessary safeguards
The laws in Saudi Arabia guarantee freedom of expression and consider constructive criticism a vital tool for improving governmental and institutional performance and correcting shortcomings. The Basic Law of Governance and related media regulations protect the individual's right to express their opinion, provided that this does not infringe upon public order or violate the freedoms of others. This delicate balance is what regulatory bodies strive to establish, ensuring a healthy media environment that supports development rather than hindering it.
Indicators of media chaos: Where does the danger lie?
According to regulatory guidelines, the problem does not lie in the opinion itself, but rather in practices that deviate from professional standards. The manifestations of media chaos can be summarized in several key points:
- Spreading misinformation or rumors that lack reliable sources.
- Taking official statements out of context or extracting them from their original context to achieve ulterior motives.
- Incitement and stirring up public opinion against institutions or individuals.
- Defamation and personal abuse are far removed from objective criticism of performance.
Importance and impact: Protecting community and national security
Regulating the media landscape transcends being a purely local matter, becoming an urgent necessity with regional and international dimensions. Locally, regulating media discourse contributes to strengthening national unity and protecting society from the upheavals that malicious rumors can cause. Regionally and internationally, the media's commitment to professionalism enhances the country's image and credibility, and thwarts external campaigns that might exploit information chaos to destabilize the region. Furthermore, a regulated and transparent media environment is a fundamental pillar for attracting investment and supporting the objectives of the Kingdom's Vision 2030, which relies on accurate and reliable information.
Ultimate goal: responsible and informed media
In conclusion, media regulation does not aim to silence voices or suppress opinions, but rather focuses exclusively on regulating practices that violate professional ethics. The ultimate goal is to achieve a responsible media landscape where everyone exercises their right to criticize and express themselves, while being aware of the importance of words and their impact on the security and stability of the nation.
